Research Ethics, Integrity and Governance: What is the difference and who is responsible?
A culture of integrity is vital for society to trust research and researchers. If discoveries cannot be trusted there can be no innovation or impact, and no justification for funding. In 2014 the Nuffield Council on Bioethics published an influential report examining the culture of scientific research. The report concluded that while the virtues most people associate with research are “rigour, accuracy, originality, honesty and transparency”, high levels of competition and limited resources create incentives for “poor quality research practices, less collaboration, and headline chasing”. This report was one of the factors motivating a UK Science and Technology Select Committee (Commons) inquiry into research integrity. Their reports (Jun & Oct 2018) concluded that more could be done to reduce misconduct and promote integrity. Recommendations included strengthening the Universities UK Concordat on Research Integrity, creating a national Research Integrity Committee, and increasing the powers of the Health Research Authority to regulate research (especially around Transparency). This workshop will propose that “Good Research” has three important components: Ethics, Integrity and Governance. It will examine the role of each, how they relate to each other, and given upcoming changes who within the research environment should take responsibility.
Dr Simon Kolstoe - Academic Ethicist, University of Portsmouth
|Level:||Open to all|
|Date:||17th June 2019|
|Time:||09:45 - 11:00|
|Room:||Meeting Room 3a|